• Home
  •  » High Street
  •  » The Bush-Obama-Trump Whitehouse - Your privacy down the shitter

#1201 2017-12-06 12:32:29

What you are seeing is a golden age of oppertunity. In fact it is just the American way of entrepreneurship and capitalizing on an expanding market.

The Prince/Devos clan and all the rest see the grand oppertunity to fan the flames of Trump's fear of enemies and forge full speed ahead with ways to make that pay. My God, to see these day's dawn, it is a wonder to behold. Too bad for the rest of the world that will be caught in the vise, it's the new American exceptionalism in action.

This will make Nixon roaming the halls yelling at dead presidents on the walls seem like child's play.  Where is G Gordon Liddy when we need him?

Offline

 

#1202 2017-12-06 13:18:56

Johnny_Rotten wrote:

What you are seeing is a golden age of oppertunity. In fact it is just the American way of entrepreneurship and capitalizing on an expanding market.

Same ole' story since the Grant administration.

Online

 

#1203 2017-12-06 13:43:24

Johnny_Rotten wrote:

This will make Nixon roaming the halls yelling at dead presidents on the walls seem like child's play.  Where is G Gordon Liddy when we need him?

Bite you tongue, he was never sane but he was still kicking when I looked it up yesterday.

Last edited by choad (2017-12-06 13:44:28)

Online

 

#1204 2017-12-06 17:15:50

choad wrote:

Johnny_Rotten wrote:

This will make Nixon roaming the halls yelling at dead presidents on the walls seem like child's play.  Where is G Gordon Liddy when we need him?

Bite you tongue, he was never sane but he was still kicking when I looked it up yesterday.

I heard an interview Liddy had with Larry King decades ago when King was still doing late night radio.  Crazy like a fox, I'm thinking.

Offline

 

#1205 2017-12-06 17:51:12

The fox knows the chickens always come home to roost. Easy pickens'.

http://high-street.org/uploads/359_9121.jpg

Offline

 

#1206 2017-12-07 16:23:20

Baywolfe wrote:

choad wrote:

Johnny_Rotten wrote:

This will make Nixon roaming the halls yelling at dead presidents on the walls seem like child's play.  Where is G Gordon Liddy when we need him?

Bite you tongue, he was never sane but he was still kicking when I looked it up yesterday.

I heard an interview Liddy had with Larry King decades ago when King was still doing late night radio.  Crazy like a fox, I'm thinking.

Attended a lecture G-Man gave at W&L in 1980. Believe he was fresh out of the hoosegow.   Entertaining fellow and certainly no love lost on John Sirica.   
Always got a kick hearing him describe Mrs. Liddy's gun collection, on the radio show.  There's a signed copy of "Will" somewhere around here.

Offline

 

#1207 2017-12-08 08:50:03

Hi! Thanks for the opened thread! I enjoyed reading it and willing to discuss this problem hereinafter!

Offline

 

#1208 2017-12-08 09:13:59

Dear choad,

                I have been reviewing my records and can not find where BreannaWatson has submitted her payment of 1 full frontal and one ass photograph.

               Please collect and forward to me at once so I can get her account activated.

                                                           Sin-cerely,

                                                                               bigcat

Offline

 

#1209 2017-12-08 10:06:58

Bigcat wrote:

I have been reviewing my records and can not find where BreannaWatson has submitted her payment of 1 full frontal and one ass photograph.

Aww, behave, will ya? Answering kindness with a rotten raspberry is no kind of welcome.

Online

 

#1210 2017-12-08 10:20:06

This is likely what "she" looks like:

https://images.newrepublic.com/958911b3280a3fa057f34b444721f5dbdf7f47c8.jpeg?w=1200&q=65&dpi=1&fm=pjpg&h=900

Online

 

#1211 2017-12-08 14:42:41

choad wrote:

Bigcat wrote:

I have been reviewing my records and can not find where BreannaWatson has submitted her payment of 1 full frontal and one ass photograph.

Aww, behave, will ya? Answering kindness with a rotten raspberry is no kind of welcome.

It wasn't a rotten berry it was a joke. Lighten the fuck up.

Offline

 

#1212 2017-12-08 17:38:00

My take was similar to Goober's. I guessed that "she" was a spammer. in part based on the website data from her profile page, but also because of her awkward phrasing and use of the term "hereinafter" (big and obscure words might impress someone who actually needed a term paper written, although they are more likely to have the opposite effect on a sophisticated audience, particularly if they are used inappropriately).

I bit my tongue because I wasn't sure enough to comment.

I realize my assessment could be wrong, in which case I owe Breanna an apology. But that was my hunch upon first encountering her message.

In the spirit of reconciliation I'd be happy to provide Bigcat with more ta ta and nae nae pics, however, if that would help calm things down. My inner pornographer is really starting to blossom since I started posting here.

Offline

 

#1213 2017-12-08 18:48:31

Smudge wrote:

My take was similar to Goober's. I guessed that "she" was a spammer. in part based on the website data from her profile page, but also because of her awkward phrasing and use of the term "hereinafter" (big and obscure words might impress someone who actually needed a term paper written, although they are more likely to have the opposite effect on a sophisticated audience, particularly if they are used inappropriately).

I bit my tongue because I wasn't sure enough to comment.

I realize my assessment could be wrong, in which case I owe Breanna an apology. But that was my hunch upon first encountering her message.

In the spirit of reconciliation I'd be happy to provide Bigcat with more ta ta and nae nae pics, however, if that would help calm things down. My inner pornographer is really starting to blossom since I started posting here.

Stop sending me pictures of your ta-tas Smudgie.

Offline

 

#1214 2017-12-08 19:55:18

You know you don't mean that (and how did you know it was me in the pics?)

Offline

 

#1215 2017-12-08 20:09:39

Smudge wrote:

My inner pornographer is really starting to blossom

It's a pretty amazing feeling when your true Dharma is realized, no?

Offline

 

#1216 2017-12-08 20:29:51

Bigcat wrote:

Smudge wrote:

My inner pornographer is really starting to blossom

It's a pretty amazing feeling when your true Dharma is realized, no?

It feels like coming home again.

Offline

 

#1218 2018-01-21 05:15:13

https://high-street.org/sidepic/james.clapper.dni.png


~ click ~

Online

 

#1219 2018-02-09 11:55:16

Ahh the Internet of Things; LL Bean plans to keep tabs on where and when you wear your boots.

Offline

 

#1220 2018-02-09 14:21:43

{delete} wrong thread

Last edited by Emmeran (2018-02-09 14:40:09)

Offline

 

#1221 2018-02-10 09:48:53

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/kOIgetL8BSru7wus6vUz4dhAQ9A=/0x0:4500x3054/920x613/filters:focal(1890x1167:2610x1887):format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/58619791/915205050.jpg.0.jpg

~Crick~

Last edited by GooberMcNutly (2018-02-10 09:49:13)

Online

 

#1222 2018-02-11 09:45:43

https://high-street.org/sidepic/ajit.pai.png

~ click ~

Online

 

#1223 2018-02-11 11:01:53

That one needs to be hung up-side down in the town square also.  Unfucking this mess is going to take forever.

Offline

 

#1224 2018-02-11 13:55:08

Emmeran wrote:

That one needs to be hung up-side down in the town square also.  Unfucking this mess is going to take forever.

Fortunately, enough of the original machinery of the constitution is still in place so that individual states are beginning to fight for Net Neutrality and it appears that the movement is gaining steam not losing it.

Offline

 

#1225 2018-02-22 11:04:10

https://high-street.org/sidepic/cagedcloud.png


~ click ~

Online

 

#1227 2018-02-25 09:57:19

We've become so inured to getting fucked sideways they're not using lube anymore.

Online

 

#1228 2018-02-25 10:59:17

choad wrote:

We've become so inured to getting fucked sideways they're not using lube anymore.

You got that right.

Offline

 

#1230 2018-03-07 12:56:16

My concern is not so much with the one in ten thousand who might have something on their computer which they shouldn't, but rather with the other 9,999 whose privacy is invaded in the process. The FBI itself is incentivizing illegal activity, for money, by private sector actors.

I've decided that the next time I reload my OS I'm going to encrypt my home folder. I don't have anything worth hiding, but if anyone wants to invade my privacy, I'd just as soon make it as expensive and difficult as possible.

Geek Squad staff 'paid by FBI' to flag illegal imagery

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/320/cpsprodpb/1244F/production/_100313847_geek_squad_alamy.jpg

...The rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation said that the relationship "circumvents computer owners' Fourth Amendment rights" to privacy.

The FBI did not respond to questions about its relationship with other repair companies, according to the EFF...

Read the rest: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-43315176

Offline

 

#1231 2018-03-07 16:48:08

Smudge wrote:

My concern is not so much with the one in ten thousand who might have something on their computer which they shouldn't, but rather with the other 9,999 whose privacy is invaded in the process. The FBI itself is incentivizing illegal activity, for money, by private sector actors.

Bring USB key with naughty pics, upload to customers computer, turn them in for $500 bounty. Profit.

Online

 

#1232 2018-03-13 00:05:52

https://high-street.org/sidepic/james.clapper.dni.png


~ click ~

Online

 

#1233 2018-03-17 21:34:17

https://high-street.org/sidepic/spyvsspy3.png


Spy vs spy. Its always spy vs spy.

Last edited by choad (2018-03-18 08:11:10)

Offline

 

#1234 2018-03-18 08:08:41

https://high-street.org/sidepic/mapstealers.png


Tech Giant's Gestapo

Last edited by choad (2018-03-18 22:03:44)

Online

 

#1235 2018-03-18 16:12:04

Offline

 

#1236 2018-03-18 21:40:08

SpacePuppy wrote:

about:blank

Clicky the piccy

Online

 

#1237 2018-03-28 11:38:26

http://high-street.org/uploads/11_facebook_company.jpg

Offline

 

#1238 2018-04-04 13:02:57

https://high-street.org/sidepic/gerald.trump.png


~ click ~

Online

 

#1239 2018-04-04 17:21:14

Offline

 

#1240 2018-04-12 00:10:39

https://high-street.org/sidepic/hsovcopters.png
Subtlety seems to have gone out of style these days.

Earlier this week, Bloomberg Law uncovered a Department of Homeland Security job listing for a "media-monitoring services" request to keep tabs on more than 290,000 "global news sources" and develop an extensive database for an unconfirmed number of "media influencers." After news outlets reported about the amount of data sought by this job listing, DHS Press Secretary Tyler Houlton issued a response on Friday to verify its legitimacy and allege that the data project's aims will be "standard practice."

What's more, Houlton added, "Any suggestion otherwise is fit for tinfoil hat-wearing, black-helicopter conspiracy theorists."

Offline

 

#1241 2018-04-12 09:29:30

develop an extensive database for an unconfirmed number of "media influencers."

Also known as "leverage"...

Online

 

#1242 2018-04-12 17:29:54

GooberMcNutly wrote:

develop an extensive database for an unconfirmed number of "media influencers."

Also known as "leverage"...

This is the way the world ends...

Offline

 

#1244 2018-04-13 18:53:38

An estimated 170 million CCTV cameras are already in place and some 400 million new ones are expected be installed in the next three years.

That's only one camera per 2.5 people. We need more!

Online

 

#1245 2018-04-14 07:52:50

GooberMcNutly wrote:

That's only one camera per 2.5 people. We need more!

What is the cell phone ownership there in China these days? we are at 98% or so in the true blue USA. That is even better than a camera for keeping tabs on the enemy the people. Plus silly kids young and old buy 'em up themselves, keeping spooky police folks budgets free for more fun and games.

Offline

 

#1246 2018-04-14 08:58:33

Johnny_Rotten wrote:

We are at 98% or so in the true blue USA.

I lived 40 yrs ago with a pediatric resident tethered round the clock by a ball & chain beeper and thought to myself, never in hell.

I AM THE 2%!

Do I win a prize?

Online

 

#1247 2018-04-14 10:22:16

Oh, I am SURE they are watching you, so nyet, no prize for you!

Offline

 

#1248 2018-04-15 09:05:05

Facebook fuels broad privacy debate by tracking non-users

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Concern about Facebook Inc’s (FB.O) respect for data privacy is widening to include the information it collects about non-users, after Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg said the world’s largest social network tracks people whether they have accounts or not...

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-face … SKBN1HM0DR

(Thanks, Emmeran, for fixing my blunder. I've corrected this post now, so you can delete your post if you wish.)

Last edited by Smudge (2018-04-15 11:58:47)

Offline

 

#1249 2018-04-15 11:27:56

Smudge wrote:

Facebook fuels broad privacy debate by tracking non-users

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Concern about Facebook Inc’s (FB.O) respect for data privacy is widening to include the information it collects about non-users, after Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg said the world’s largest social network tracks people whether they have accounts or not...

https://s18.postimg.cc/o2t8far2x/image.jpg

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-face … SKBN1HM0DR

Offline

 
  • Home
  •  » High Street
  •  » The Bush-Obama-Trump Whitehouse - Your privacy down the shitter

Board footer

high-street.org