#51 2017-01-09 23:37:16

Quick Note: A thread linked to a predictable Portlandia post decrying "America's Rising Tide Of Stupidity" currently tops the drudge.com charts with 123 comments.

Offline

 

#52 2017-01-10 20:03:49

I can hardly believe I made it here first with breaking news.

No, I don't CARE if it's true or not.

Offline

 

#53 2017-01-11 11:14:15

He's always been a rainmaker.

Offline

 

#55 2017-01-11 12:52:58

George Orr wrote:

https://twitter.com/Penthouse/status/819012191793745920

I told you this would be a great show.

!!SPOILER ALERT!!  -  I've heard that in Act-III the Republicans have to impeach their own President.

Last edited by Emmeran (2017-01-11 12:53:14)

Offline

 

#56 2017-01-11 13:14:03

Emmeran wrote:

George Orr wrote:

https://twitter.com/Penthouse/status/819012191793745920

I told you this would be a great show.

!!SPOILER ALERT!!  -  I've heard that in Act-III the Republicans have to impeach their own President.

Which means THIS GUY would then be President.

Yes, it's from Huffington, prove any of their accusations wrong if you can.

Offline

 

#57 2017-01-11 13:34:47

https://high-street.org/sidepic/goldenshower.jpg

Offline

 

#58 2017-01-11 15:10:28

He's definitely out, fucking with the campaign contributions and dividend checks.  That shit just won't fly.

Offline

 

#59 2017-01-11 19:51:26

Emmeran wrote:

He's definitely out, fucking with the campaign contributions and dividend checks.  That shit just won't fly.

Agreed.  Fucking with underage pageant contestants isn't what will bring him down; fucking with finances is what'll do it.  I'm a little astonished that he is not smart enough to understand this.

Offline

 

#60 2017-01-14 19:32:59

Where it all began, back to the the very first peep.

http://high-street.org/uploads/359_1989-trump-death-penalty-ad.png

Still guilty after all these years.

http://high-street.org/uploads/359_cp5.jpg

Last edited by Johnny_Rotten (2017-01-15 13:56:24)

Offline

 

#61 2017-01-15 00:30:26

This stellar short link doesn't appear paywalled.

http://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultur … with-trump

Please note: I haven't set foot on a golf course since 1968. Thank you.

Offline

 

#64 2017-01-17 15:01:13

I'd take those odds on Trump being killed by one of the rabid toothless wonders we saw at all the Trump rallies when they find out how badly he screwed them over.

Offline

 

#65 2017-01-17 15:36:02

Baywolfe wrote:

I'd take those odds on Trump being killed by one of the rabid toothless wonders we saw at all the Trump rallies when they find out how badly he screwed them over.

Naah.  Way more sinister, my droogs.

I'll just say this... the last time a POTUS fucked with the chief spooks, he ended up in a to-go box before his term ever ended.  And his best boy wasn't far behind.

Hardball doesn't even begin to describe the game these intel guys play... Trump's nothing but baby meat in a den of old lions.

Offline

 

#66 2017-01-17 15:57:18

whosasailorthen wrote:

Naah.  Way more sinister, my droogs.

I'll just say this... the last time a POTUS fucked with the chief spooks, he ended up in a to-go box before his term ever ended.  And his best boy wasn't far behind.

Hardball doesn't even begin to describe the game these intel guys play... Trump's nothing but baby meat in a den of old lions.

See!!  And you thought I was nuts for wanting to see him elected.  Look at all the fun we're having, we have a game show host for president - this is so cool.

(Frankly I would have voted anyone over that Clinton and in fact did)

Offline

 

#67 2017-01-17 22:03:37

This is 100% real.  Don't hate me for posting a link to Facebook; a lot of the replies are 24K.

Offline

 

#68 2017-01-18 10:33:29

whosasailorthen wrote:

Baywolfe wrote:

I'd take those odds on Trump being killed by one of the rabid toothless wonders we saw at all the Trump rallies when they find out how badly he screwed them over.

Naah.  Way more sinister, my droogs.

I'll just say this... the last time a POTUS fucked with the chief spooks, he ended up in a to-go box before his term ever ended.  And his best boy wasn't far behind.

Hardball doesn't even begin to describe the game these intel guys play... Trump's nothing but baby meat in a den of old lions.

Sorry, my mistake, I meant that's who the spooks will frame for the murder.

Offline

 

#70 2017-01-20 07:09:33

George Orr wrote:

Trump has endeavored to ensure that his first day as commander-in-chief is marked by an unusual display of heavy military equipment.  Because who wouldn't want to evoke that old Third World vibe on his very first day?

There you go again, haven't we warned you about paying any heed to the actual content of the noises emitted by the Great Orange Hope?  You ought to be embarrassed . . .

Offline

 

#71 2017-01-20 09:53:44

If the USA and Russia are about to resume THE GREAT PISSING CONTEST [tm] then I sure as hell want tanks and rocket launchers in the military parade.  Get a whole bunch of those troops that can do the fancy stepping, while we're at it.

Offline

 

#72 2017-01-20 10:25:25

https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/15203357_1394899297269787_8884741911790639509_n.png?oh=b7c530f3385fd5862317b178e01a79b6&oe=590A8BCF

Last edited by Mugwump (2017-01-20 10:25:49)

Offline

 

#73 2017-01-20 10:58:11

Baywolfe wrote:

If the USA and Russia are about to resume THE GREAT PISSING CONTEST [tm] then I sure as hell want tanks and rocket launchers in the military parade.  Get a whole bunch of those troops that can do the fancy stepping, while we're at it.

We always have the ceremonial troops, nothing really has changed nor was there ever a push for it.  That was a Huff Post puff piece to keep the rabble roused, whatevers.

HuffPuff wrote:

During the preparation for Fridayís transfer-of-power, a member of Trumpís transition team floated the idea of including tanks and missile launchers in the inaugural parade, a source involved in inaugural planning told The Huffington Post.

Half the fun of Weave-head being elected is having these sort of pieces make the rounds, much like reading the Conservative shit during and before the Obama Inauguration.

Last edited by Emmeran (2017-01-20 11:01:22)

Offline

 

#74 2017-01-20 11:18:28

Emmeran wrote:

We always have the ceremonial troops, nothing really has changed nor was there ever a push for it.

I want my tanks and rocket launchers Dog Gammit!!!

Offline

 

#75 2017-01-20 11:23:22

Baywolfe wrote:

I want my tanks and rocket launchers Dog Gammit!!!

You'll just have to be happy with Aeroplanes and Whirlybirds

Offline

 

Board footer

high-street.org