#51 2008-10-14 16:50:23

jesusluvspegging wrote:

orangeplus wrote:

why would requesting reciprocation be an impossible suggestion?

I'd say it'd stand a decent probability of chumming the waters a bit around here with religious types.  They might just decide we need saving...

now that sounds like fun

Offline

 

#52 2008-10-14 18:04:41

you might want to fix the spelling of everlastingblort.
Or not.

Offline

 

#53 2008-10-14 18:19:04

orangeplus wrote:

jesusluvspegging wrote:

I'd say it'd stand a decent probability of chumming the waters a bit around here with religious types.  They might just decide we need saving...

now that sounds like fun

My point exactly.

Offline

 

#54 2008-10-14 19:25:59

What about that nice young man with the lolporn?

Offline

 

#55 2008-10-14 20:34:08

George Orr wrote:

What about that nice young man with the lolporn?

If you sign up, you can makes sum pron!

Offline

 

#56 2008-10-15 00:26:22

I would suggest, for purely capatilistic purposes (hey, the fucking state pays just a BIT over minumum wage....  I'm broke, bitch!)  http://www.liberalmartyr.com

It's lame, I know.  I'm new to the blogging phenomenon... I've blogged before, but not on any type of schedule.

By the way, would anyone be so kind as to explain to me the animated gif of a sweaty pedophile chewing on a young man's shirt?  It's right above Uncle Dirty.  I'm disturbed and confused and just not drunk enough to get it.

Last edited by feisty (2008-10-15 00:28:29)

Offline

 

#57 2008-10-15 00:34:00

feisty, I assumed it was a preacher or youth minister being overwhlemed by the magnificent splendor of that purty little mouth singing god's glory (hole?).

But that's just a guess.

Offline

 

#58 2008-10-15 00:39:50

I'd wager to say you're right, Dupe.  You always have to be afraid of those crazy Christian fucks.

Offline

 

#59 2008-10-15 12:07:00

Les

Thanks for adding my site to the roll.  Now if you will exuse me, I am late for my hepititus test.

Les

Offline

 

#60 2008-10-15 12:36:59

For fuck's sake, the Weiner can't even spell hepatitis.
Also, I find it inequitable that we've added Weiner-WunderLand but not Hot Dog Jo.
At least Jo has tits, and a snug (presumably) little (presumably) virgin (presumably) vagina (presumably), whereas Weiner...well...I'll let pENIx go there (slurp-slurpitty-slurp).

Offline

 

#61 2008-10-15 12:56:49

Les wrote:

Thanks for adding my site to the roll.  Now if you will exuse me, I am late for my hepititus test.

Les

If it's negative we're dropping you.  We don't want to encourage the wrong sort around here.

Offline

 

#62 2008-10-15 14:29:19

Les wrote:

Buck up skippy.  You will be in shape in no time; or a no go [fail].

Offline

 

#63 2008-10-15 15:48:08

Check out "strange affiliation" on Curdled. the dude says he doesn't know how he ended up on H.S.

Then goes on to say that he thinks we're weird but well behaved.

Compares H.S to a car wreck. GOOOD STUFF!

Last edited by Bigcat (2008-10-15 15:50:21)

Offline

 

#65 2008-10-15 15:56:22

Sorry for that!

Offline

 

#66 2008-10-15 15:57:56

Bigcat wrote:

Sorry for that!

You should be, you big jerk.  Nobody brings up the same topic twice.  NOBODY!!!

Offline

 

#67 2008-10-15 17:54:47

Les

The post on Curdled is how I ended up here....

Offline

 

#68 2008-10-15 19:40:15

Anonymous said...
check out the stickied lolcat thread, sick and twisted in a sachrine way.
and MAKE SHURE they dont find out who you are
also some where in the archive is a history of the site as it came from cruel.com
you fit because of your introspection and less than publically acceptable meanderings.
two of the big posters there sell sex toys and such you can see their ads here and there on the site.

a lurker who is not Lurker

Offline

 

#69 2008-10-15 19:44:38

Les wrote:

The post on Curdled is how I ended up here....

"Itís like rubbernecking at a car-wreck: you know you shouldnít look, and you know itís not going to be a pleasant sight, but you just canít help it." Seems like he doesn't know we used to be Cruel.com.

Offline

 

#70 2008-10-16 12:09:45

I forgot about MightyGodKing.

His most recent entry is a very nice essay/review of Terry Pratchett--I didn't even know he was a Pratchett fan--but I'm suggesting it for the funny shit.  There's some seriously funny shit in there.

Offline

 

#71 2008-10-16 12:38:16

George Orr wrote:

I forgot about MightyGodKing.

Thanks, he's there.

Offline

 

#72 2008-10-17 23:48:37

the best film and pop culture blog ever
http://tsutpen.blogspot.com/

Offline

 

#75 2008-10-19 07:44:55

Coffee wrote:

the site had gone downhill in the past year.

Yeah!  Suck on that, pope-squatter!

Offline

 

#76 2008-10-24 21:32:05

I think I found another winner:

http://margaretandhelen.wordpress.com/

Everyone who knows a sweet little old lady knows that sweet little old ladies are fucking mean.  I'm looking forward to it, myself.

Evidently she couldnít just be a pitt bull.  She had to be a pitt bull in lipstick.  And we all know it costs a lot of money to make an aging beauty queen look like a pitt bull in lipstick...

What really gets my goat is that I could have put that same wardrobe together at JC Penny for about $300 with enough money left over for a piece of pie and coffee.  Are you telling me THAT is the best they could do with $150,000?   I know Iíve seen the same three outfits about a dozen times this week alone.  And when this is all over, it all goes to charity.  Well isnít that just rich?   Donít give them health insurance, give them designer clothing.  Honestly, only a Republican could have come up with that one.

Offline

 

#77 2008-10-24 21:46:30

George Orr wrote:

I think I found another winner:

http://margaretandhelen.wordpress.com/

Cool, not least because we've lost some. You Can Has LOLpron is apparently no longer in bid'ness.

Last edited by choad (2008-10-24 21:47:46)

Offline

 

#78 2008-11-18 17:47:32

Offline

 

#79 2008-11-18 17:58:12

I think you meant this link: http://www.dancarlin.com/

You gave the link directly to the RSS feed.

Offline

 

#80 2008-11-18 18:00:42

tojo2000 wrote:

I think you meant this link: http://www.dancarlin.com/

You gave the link directly to the RSS feed.

Ouch. Thanks.

Offline

 

#82 2008-12-10 20:40:03

I have a modest suggestion:  http://www.postcardsfromyomomma.com

Not howlingly funny, but surprisingly amusing, given the premise.

Offline

 

#84 2009-01-03 23:29:38

For what it's worth, only Drudge Retort and Yay Hooray from the affiliate list are among the top 30 referrers to High-Street.  Note that the configuration on the new server does not currently prevent hotlinking, so many of those listed are likely just embedding H-S graphics, not actually directing users here.  The numbers are out of a total of 722,509 successful requests over the past 16 days.

Code:

Listing the top 30 referring sites by the number of
requests, sorted by the number of requests.

reqs   site
6339   http://images.google.com/
2580   http://www.theforum.com/
1535   http://forums.phishhook.com/
1239   http://www.google.com/
1181   http://images.google.co.uk/
718    http://www.sternfannetwork.com/
522    http://images.google.ca/
405    http://images.google.de/
297    http://seedmain.com/
295    http://images.google.com.au/
265    http://xlforum.net/
242    http://images.google.fr/
234    http://greenlobster.net/
218    http://debat.jubii.dk/
192    http://search.live.com/
183    http://www.drudge.com/ *****
165    http://www.umphreaks.com/
141    http://images.google.it/
121    http://profile.myspace.com/
111    http://forums.bikeme.tv/
110    http://www.yayhooray.com/ *****
101    http://forum.gorillamask.net/
100    http://forums.frenezy.org/
95     http://images.google.com.br/
87     http://images.google.nl/
82     http://74.125.95.132/
82     http://images.google.pl/
76     http://www.google.co.uk/
66     http://my.yahoo.com/
65     http://images.google.com.sa/
2412   [not listed: 325 sites]

Last edited by square (2009-01-03 23:41:22)

Offline

 

#85 2009-01-03 23:38:56

"sternfan"?  Yuck!

Offline

 

#86 2009-01-03 23:51:25

George Orr wrote:

"sternfan"?  Yuck!

None of those previously unfamiliar sites seem especially simpatico.

Offline

 

#87 2009-01-04 01:41:57

it would be a more interesting report if you could filter out the obvious image links, anything google.

Offline

 

#88 2009-01-04 15:10:30

OK, the following report shows the requests for pages, which basically means .php files.  This is a better measure of actual traffic to the site since it excludes hotlinked images.  The "reqs" column includes all requests, including requests for images.

Code:

Listing the top 75 referring sites by the number of requests
for pages, sorted by the number of requests for pages.
pages reqs  site
6584  6585  http://images.google.com/
1280  1285  http://www.google.com/
1195  1217  http://images.google.co.uk/
534   534   http://images.google.ca/
419   419   http://images.google.de/
308   308   http://images.google.com.au/
297   297   http://seedmain.com/
252   252   http://images.google.fr/
196   196   http://search.live.com/
193   193   http://www.drudge.com/
154   154   http://images.google.it/
98    98    http://images.google.com.br/
90    90    http://images.google.nl/
86    86    http://images.google.pl/
76    77    http://www.google.co.uk/
66    66    http://my.yahoo.com/
66    66    http://images.google.com.sa/
65    65    http://images.google.co.in/
59    59    http://images.google.es/
57    57    http://images.google.com.mx/
56    56    http://images.google.co.nz/
49    49    http://images.google.se/
46    46    http://images.google.com.tr/
44    44    http://images.google.ch/
43    43    http://images.google.be/
43    44    http://www.google.ca/
40    40    http://images.google.co.za/
38    38    http://aolsearch.aol.com/
37    37    http://images.google.co.jp/
36    37    http://www.google.de/
34    34    http://images.google.at/
28    28    http://images.google.ie/
27    27    http://ricercaimmagini.alice.it/
25    25    http://www.google.com.au/
23    23    http://images.google.ae/
22    22    http://images.google.dk/
21    21    http://images.google.fi/
20    20    http://search.yahoo.com/
20    20    http://images.google.com.sg/
19    19    http://images.google.no/
19    19    http://images.google.com.my/
17    17    http://search.aol.com/
17    17    http://images.google.ru/
15    15    http://www.google.com.pk/
15    15    http://images.google.com.pr/
14    14    http://www.google.it/
14    14    http://view.busca.uol.com.br/
14    14    http://listoftheday.blogspot.com/
14    14    http://images.google.com.pk/
14    16    http://www.google.fr/
13    13    http://images.google.pt/
13    13    http://www.google.nl/
13    13    http://images.google.com.ar/
13    13    http://www.youtube.com/
12    12    http://www.google.co.in/
12    12    http://images.google.com.co/
11    11    http://images.google.com.kw/
11    11    http://images.google.cl/
10    10    http://images.search.yahoo.com/
10    263   http://greenlobster.net/
10    10    http://groups.google.com/
9     9     http://cm.my.yahoo.com/
9     9     http://www.fugly.net/
8     8     http://www.google.co.nz/
7     7     http://www.google.at/
7     7     http://www.msplinks.com/
7     7     http://www.google.com.tr/
6     6     http://images.google.lu/
6     6     http://images.google.co.ke/
6     6     http://www.askpeter.info/
6     6     http://twitter.com/
6     6     http://images.google.com.qa/
6     6     http://cobalt/
5     5     http://images.google.co.kr/
5     5     http://dashboard.wordpress.com/
393   7505  [not listed: 289 sites]

With the obvious search engines removed:

Code:

pages reqs  site
297   297   http://seedmain.com/
193   193   http://www.drudge.com/
14    14    http://view.busca.uol.com.br/
14    14    http://listoftheday.blogspot.com/
13    13    http://www.youtube.com/
10    263   http://greenlobster.net/
10    10    http://groups.google.com/
9     9     http://cm.my.yahoo.com/
9     9     http://www.fugly.net/
7     7     http://www.msplinks.com/
6     6     http://twitter.com/
6     6     http://cobalt/
5     5     http://dashboard.wordpress.com/

Edit: total successful requests for pages was 204,807 and total successful overall requests was 753,650 for the period.

Last edited by square (2009-01-04 15:16:40)

Offline

 

#89 2009-01-04 15:59:57

What is http://seedmain.com?  It doesn't resolve on my DNS server.

Offline

 

#90 2009-01-04 16:03:51

Seedmain is the dial-up provider for Spain. However, they appear to be somewhat of a lawless system, rife with hackers and spammers. Someone on their network was sucking down gigs of bandwidth from my site. I asked my host to block their entire hostname, which technically is rima-tde.net.

Offline

 

#91 2009-01-07 14:25:49

I nominate http://thebloggess.com, and I wish I could be a fly on the wall when she discovers it.

Offline

 

#92 2009-01-08 04:06:44

tojo2000 wrote:

I nominate http://thebloggess.com, and I wish I could be a fly on the wall when she discovers it.

If sofaking were a writer, this is exactly what I imagine her blog would be like.

Offline

 

#93 2009-01-08 15:54:26

square wrote:

If sofaking were a writer, this is exactly what I imagine her blog would be like.

Perhaps you know a side of Sofie I don't, but I really do not find her posts quite so droll and self-indulgent.

Offline

 

#94 2009-01-08 16:07:58

square wrote:

tojo2000 wrote:

I nominate http://thebloggess.com, and I wish I could be a fly on the wall when she discovers it.

If sofaking were a writer, this is exactly what I imagine her blog would be like.

Maybe if she was still on the hard stuff.

Offline

 

#96 2009-01-11 12:23:35

I'm rather enjoying this Blogess site.

Offline

 

#97 2009-01-14 22:37:33

This might not be of broad enough interest to put on the sidebar, but at least Bigcat and exdwarf might get a kick out of it.

Straight Outta Johnstown
http://high-street.org/uploads/72_soj-voramobile-grafitti-copy22.jpg

If others think it's worthy, I'll add it to the list.

Offline

 

#98 2009-01-15 16:51:49

It has greatly troubled my heart to voyage to this vast kingdom of wanton mockery and carnality, yet I must suggest ChristWire.org for your consideration.  Now I notice that you use 'submit a missing link', which naturally suggests someone here embraces the deceptive evolution talk and clearly needs his/her heart purified from the ashy soot of liberal thinking.

Pastor Jack Appropriately Spreads Paranoia and Fear

Last edited by Adam Nelson (2009-01-15 16:52:58)

Offline

 

#99 2009-01-15 17:09:13

I dunno who this "Adam Nelson" is, but following a few links on ChristWire has convinced me that High-Street needs to be connected to its purifying goodness.  Besides, they got a whole blog entry condemning us.

P.S.  to "Adam" - the alternative term for the links was "Reach-Arounds."  But we were afraid that might attract the homosexuals.

Offline

 

#100 2009-01-15 17:15:18

George Orr wrote:

But we were afraid that might attract the homosexuals.

God forbid.

Offline

 

Board footer

high-street.org