#1 2007-10-16 09:06:31

http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/4900/folsomstreetfairposternd0.jpg




Folsom Street Fair, not for everyone?



http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/484/muchtooyoungsd6.jpg

Offline

 

#2 2007-10-16 10:04:49

Folsom Street Fair, it's not just for Gays anymore,  or breakfast....

Offline

 

#3 2007-10-16 16:19:23

Lurker wrote:

Folsom Street Fair, it's not just for Gays anymore

Indeed. It's also for the specific and intentional annoyance of fake journalists.

http://www.xmere.com/forums/uploads/highstreet/oreilly_evil1.jpg

Offline

 

#4 2007-10-17 02:53:39

pALEPHx wrote:

Lurker wrote:

Folsom Street Fair, it's not just for Gays anymore

Indeed. It's also for the specific and intentional annoyance of fake journalists.

http://www.xmere.com/forums/uploads/hig … _evil1.jpg

So how are the city officials of San Francisco responsible for the actions of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence?  If anyone other than the sisters could be blamed for their actions, it would be the church, for fucking with their heads (and possibly other parts of their bodies) when they were children.  Too bad OíReillyís outrage wasnít real.  America might have had the pleasure of seeing him die from a stroke on live teevee.

Offline

 

#5 2007-10-17 11:34:09

Since when has anything that man says required a shred of common sense?

Offline

 

#6 2007-10-17 11:35:46

This "Jesus was black" crap is really starting to get out of hand.

Last edited by scsotdc (2007-10-17 11:36:42)

Offline

 

#7 2007-10-17 15:38:46

scsotdc wrote:

This "Jesus was black" crap is really starting to get out of hand.

Not any more than the flowing golden locks as depicted in so many versions of the King James Bible

Offline

 

#8 2007-10-17 16:10:03

Emmeran wrote:

Not any more than the flowing golden locks as depicted in so many versions of the King James Bible

Fellow High Streeters, I figure Emmeran is another fucktard that I can add to my list of people who are wasting my air?

Sofie or someone really ought to PM me a list.

Offline

 

#9 2007-10-18 06:35:58

A bit more coverage of you-know-what from you-know-where.

Offline

 

#10 2007-10-18 06:58:49

pALEPHx wrote:

A bit more coverage of you-know-what from you-know-where.

Careful Pale, folks round these parts get persnickety when you post from SFGate....

Offline

 

#11 2007-10-18 14:41:40

I never minded Folsom.  I think every American city should have one day a year where anyone who wants to can run around nekkid and fuck in the streets.  Call it Sanity Day.

Hi Sofie!  Hi Trippy Dhaling!  Hi Woggah!  Hell, you too, Fnord!  Glad to see that there's still a Cruel venue, even if Rogers has wussed out.  Now, has anyone seen George Orr?

Last edited by Montecore (2007-10-18 14:42:14)

Offline

 

#12 2007-10-18 14:54:58

Monte!

Welcome!

Hope you like it here.

Offline

 

#13 2007-10-18 15:01:35

Sofie:

I'm sure I'm gonna.  My Dhal-bashing can continue unabated, my admiration for Woggah and George Orr (not necessarily in that order) can go on, and the controversy over Horse and me (which is which, and are they/not the same?) will roll on like Old Man River.  And of course, I can keep on sampling such delights of yours as Mr. Sofie permits.

Ya done good.  Thankya.  Thankyaverrmuch.

Offline

 

#14 2007-10-18 17:05:56

Montecore wrote:

Now, has anyone seen George Orr?

Here I is!  *waves like a retard*

Hiya Monte!  I've been hoping you would show up.

Offline

 

#15 2007-10-18 17:27:10

George:

Well, for the longest, I didn't know there was any place to show up to- cruel.com redirects you to the Retort, and there was nothing there to tell anyone Wha Hoppen so far as I could see.  My work takes me away from surfing for pleasure for long stretches, so I'd missed Cruel: The Finale.  Fortunately, I posted a whine to Workbench, where some other Cruellers had posted a few hail and farewell messages, eliciting a response from Rogers XVI of RCadia.  That led me here, and back into the fold.

Speaking of folds, how is Woggah?

Offline

 

#16 2007-10-18 21:57:22

pALEPHx wrote:

A bit more coverage of you-know-what from you-know-where.

A visual update.  The bitches taping this were NOT part of the congregation and did NOT participate in the service.  The Sisters here ARE Catholic and in no way meant to mock the mass.

Offline

 

#17 2007-10-18 23:04:27

Having watched several tapes of this, I donít see what the problem is.  They didnít stomp on the host or engage in abusive disruptive behavior during the service.  As one commentator mentioned, if wearing tacky clothes and hideous makeup were grounds for denial of communion, thousands of women would have to be turned away every Sunday.

Offline

 

#18 2007-10-19 02:08:39

October 7, 2008? The SPI are so good, they're demonstrating FROM THE FUTURE!

Offline

 

#19 2007-10-19 07:10:57

fnord wrote:

Having watched several tapes of this, I donít see what the problem is.  They didnít stomp on the host or engage in abusive disruptive behavior during the service.  As one commentator mentioned, if wearing tacky clothes and hideous makeup were grounds for denial of communion, thousands of women would have to be turned away every Sunday.

the women? what about the priests in their hideous drag...to paraphrase Tallulah Bankhead "Father, your purse is on fire....."

Offline

 

#20 2007-10-19 20:32:59

Dirckman took a wrong turn in San Francisco this last Tuesday and wound up in the Castro District surrounded by lots of pissed off fags with signs!!!  They were mad at Schwarzenegger for dissing them or something....

Offline

 

#21 2007-10-20 10:02:00

Dirckman wrote:

Dirckman took a wrong turn in San Francisco this last Tuesday and wound up in the Castro District surrounded by lots of pissed off fags with signs!!!  They were mad at Schwarzenegger for dissing them or something....

Just be careful in the restroom when you're in S.F.  If you mis-tap, there are worse things than being arrested.

Offline

 

Board footer

high-street.org