#131 2008-10-29 16:39:21

Bigcat wrote:

Is it wrong to be angry and feel cheated by the public school where I went because I never had the opportunuty to be molested by a hot young teacher?

Ask Scotty.

http://high-street.org/img/4scotty.png

Offline

 

#132 2008-10-29 16:46:07

OK,

Scotty,

Is it wrong to be angry and feel cheated by the public school where I went because I never had the opportunity to be molested by a hot young teacher?

I really am a little pissed about it ,for true.

Offline

 

#133 2008-10-29 17:32:51

Bigcat wrote:

OK,

Scotty,

Is it wrong to be angry and feel cheated by the public school where I went because I never had the opportunity to be molested by a hot young teacher?

I really am a little pissed about it ,for true.

Absolutely.  Why in the world do you think that this thread began life as the seminal Cruel series of threads, Teachers I Never Had Vol 1-MCMXXIV?

So much so that come the dawn of next Wednesday morn you are sure to find some Obamaite that will find a constitutional right to being molested by your 6th grade Science teacher.  My brief is already filled out just waiting to be filed.

Offline

 

#134 2008-10-29 18:14:40

Good thinking, I am going to work on mine right away.

Offline

 

#135 2008-10-29 21:55:07

Bigcat wrote:

Good thinking, I am going to work on mine right away.

Achh - one of Mommies younger girl friends got to me; I still don't know how to adequately thank her.

Offline

 

#138 2008-11-21 11:35:20

Bigcat wrote:

http://www.thedailyjournal.com/article/20081121/NEWS01/811210318

close.  no pics.

pic=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_Gunns

Offline

 

#139 2008-11-22 00:50:32

Dmtdust wrote:

pic=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_Gunns

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1a/Crystal_Gunns_DSC_0278.jpg/398px-Crystal_Gunns_DSC_0278.jpg

Offline

 

#141 2008-11-22 03:29:25

square wrote:

Dmtdust wrote:

pic=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_Gunns

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c … C_0278.jpg

Ms. Chokesondick, in the flesh!

Offline

 

#142 2008-11-22 18:07:40

The Daily Journal wrote:

In one video clip available on the Internet, Gunns is seen engaging in a sexual act with a man, but does not have intercourse.

And, I'm expected to take their word for this?  Would a hyper-link here have really been too much trouble?

Offline

 

#143 2008-11-23 20:30:52

Dmtdust wrote:

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/130979

Umm, no thanks.
http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/images/photos/2008/11/21/2w0fs9us.jpg

. . . the two met through church, the release stated.

Offline

 

#144 2008-12-17 08:37:11

Police Come Across Fogged Up SUV

At the least they got one off before they arrested them.

Offline

 

#145 2008-12-17 08:53:10

At first, police said, the boy said he was 18. Later at the hospital, though, he admitted being 13 but claimed he and the PTA mom were only kissing.

He never said "lip kissing"...

Offline

 

#146 2008-12-17 11:00:33

To make the record complete.... I present, Mrs. Robinson Mrs. Wormer Mrs. Tuckruskye...

http://imgsrv.1010wins.com/image/DbGraphic/200812/1131359.jpg

Last edited by whosasailorthen (2008-12-17 11:03:00)

Offline

 

#147 2008-12-25 21:31:08

From headkicker_girl:

A teacher on leave from a private high school in Minnesota faces charges she had a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old girl who had been her student. . . .

Koehn had been the teen's teacher and coach last year at St. Croix Lutheran High School in West St. Paul, authorities said. She continued to see the girl after starting her leave of absence from the school in June, sometimes sleeping over at the teen's home, police said. The girl still attends the school.

According to the criminal complaint, the girl's parents told authorities they believed she had slept on the floor of their daughter's bedroom and were unaware of any sexual activity.

Last edited by square (2008-12-25 21:33:57)

Offline

 

#148 2008-12-25 23:33:17

square wrote:

From headkicker_girl:

A teacher on leave from a private high school in Minnesota faces charges she had a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old girl who had been her student. . . .

Koehn had been the teen's teacher and coach last year at St. Croix Lutheran High School in West St. Paul, authorities said. She continued to see the girl after starting her leave of absence from the school in June, sometimes sleeping over at the teen's home, police said. The girl still attends the school.

According to the criminal complaint, the girl's parents told authorities they believed she had slept on the floor of their daughter's bedroom and were unaware of any sexual activity.

"Teacher and coach" said it all to me, frankly.

Offline

 

#149 2008-12-28 00:40:04

Not quite what I was hoping for (reminiscent of the lesbian fantasy/reality banner).

http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site569/2008/1223/20081223_035641_Koehn_%20Melissa%20Diana_200.jpg
Melissa Diana Koehn, of Kenosha, Wis., was charged by the Dakota County Attorney's office on Tuesday with three felony counts of criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree.

Offline

 

#151 2009-01-14 16:39:25

Of course, nothing stops the school from firing your ass and you'll probably never work as a teacher again.

Offline

 

#152 2009-01-14 17:09:53

tojo2000 wrote:

Of course, nothing stops the school from firing your ass and you'll probably never work as a teacher again.

Details.

Offline

 

#153 2009-01-21 00:23:51

I don't know if this one has been posted before: http://www.ocregister.com/articles/jaco … man-felony

http://images.ocregister.com/newsimages/2009/01/20/b78459710z120090120130108000g2og7dbq1_md.jpg

But the OC Register graciously links to the accused's profile and photos at her MySpace page: http://tinyurl.com/hopejacoby

♥ThE OnE AnD OnLy HoPe♥'s Details
Status:    Single
Here for:    Networking, Dating, Serious Relationships, Friends
Orientation:    Bi
Hometown:    The OC babyyy
Body type:    5' 7" / Average
Ethnicity:    White / Caucasian
Religion:    Christian - other
Zodiac Sign:    Pisces
Smoke / Drink:    Yes / Yes
Children:    Undecided
Education:    High school
Occupation:    Drug dealer!!!!!!!!!!!
Income:    $30,000 to $45,000

Offline

 

#154 2009-01-21 22:02:57

http://www.leesvilledailyleader.com/archive/x2119712035/g0b40f014be6e68c3826935a52cca399511c1e9c2c78150.jpg

Offline

 

#155 2009-01-21 23:10:07

Vernon Middle teacher arrested for carnal knowledge

Oh, shit!  I think that I might have some of that and there's no way that it's going to "flush."  How in the fuck am I expected to safely dispose of it be-fore I get busted?

Offline

 

#156 2009-01-22 06:28:35

In what has become a disturbing trend nationally,

Says you!

Offline

 

#158 2009-02-24 15:53:53

http://high-street.org/uploads/11_art_mass_teacher_ctsy.jpg

Click the nasty!

Offline

 

#159 2009-03-16 07:21:35

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3525/3252952348_cf992c9e45.jpg

Offline

 

#160 2009-03-16 07:34:34

Decadence wrote:

Vernon Middle teacher arrested for carnal knowledge

Oh, shit!  I think that I might have some of that and there's no way that it's going to "flush."  How in the fuck am I expected to safely dispose of it be-fore I get busted?

You can give it to me.

Offline

 

#162 2009-05-29 10:15:06

http://media.miamiherald.com/smedia/2009/05/26/19/86-5413110.embedded.prod_affiliate.56.JPG

Mommy approved!  Hawt!

Offline

 

#163 2009-06-25 09:44:24

http://high-street.org/img/peducator69.jpg

Offline

 

#164 2009-06-29 03:13:18

San Diego News Network wrote:

The victim said the relationship made him uncomfortable and he didn’t want to have sex with the defendant.

What in the fuck is wrong with kids to-day?

Offline

 

#165 2009-06-29 20:37:49

Decadence wrote:

San Diego News Network wrote:

The victim said the relationship made him uncomfortable and he didn’t want to have sex with the defendant.

What in the fuck is wrong with kids to-day?

Umm, according to one of the commenters,

commenter wrote:

...the kid's so far in the closet, he's probably in Narnia.

Good one.

Offline

 

#166 2009-06-29 21:13:59

whiskytangofoxtrot wrote:

Decadence wrote:

San Diego News Network wrote:

The victim said the relationship made him uncomfortable and he didn’t want to have sex with the defendant.

What in the fuck is wrong with kids to-day?

Umm, according to one of the commenters,

commenter wrote:

...the kid's so far in the closet, he's probably in Narnia.

Good one.

You wouldn't be saying this shit about the kid if it was a 12-year-old girl instead of a boy.  Let's be honest:  This horrible creature was 35 years old and taking advantage of a child--and I don't understand how some people can't see the horror of that just because the genders are switched.

[edit]  That doesn't mean the "Narnia" crack wasn't funny as hell.

Last edited by George Orr (2009-06-29 21:15:10)

Offline

 

#167 2009-08-19 11:32:14

http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00869/SNN1921LEZA_280_869743a.jpg

Offline

 

#168 2009-08-19 12:05:44

A PUBLIC school trumpet mistress faces jail after admitting a lesbian fling with a 15-year-old pupil.

There's something wrong about that sentence.

And the obligatory,

"I've got something she can blow."

line.

Offline

 

#169 2009-08-19 13:11:37

My lord, someone has stolen that woman's chin.

Offline

 

#170 2009-08-19 13:15:58

tojo2000 wrote:

My lord, someone has stolen that woman's chin.

I'd still hit it.

Offline

 

#171 2009-08-19 13:17:51

jesusluvspegging wrote:

tojo2000 wrote:

My lord, someone has stolen that woman's chin.

I'd still hit it.

Well, yeah.

Offline

 

#172 2009-08-19 15:34:47

George Orr wrote:

whiskytangofoxtrot wrote:

Decadence wrote:


What in the fuck is wrong with kids to-day?

Umm, according to one of the commenters,

commenter wrote:

...the kid's so far in the closet, he's probably in Narnia.

Good one.

You wouldn't be saying this shit about the kid if it was a 12-year-old girl instead of a boy.  Let's be honest:  This horrible creature was 35 years old and taking advantage of a child--and I don't understand how some people can't see the horror of that just because the genders are switched.

[edit]  That doesn't mean the "Narnia" crack wasn't funny as hell.

Umm - cuz I was a 13 year old boy at one point and getting into the pants of the 35 year old woman down the street was a wonderful experience; took me a while but I managed to do it.

Offline

 

#173 2009-08-23 10:05:33

http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site297/2009/0821/20090821__andreini_0822~P1_200.jpg

Offline

 

#174 2009-08-23 11:08:07

This is a new level of idiocy - not only did he throw away a perfectly good fuck buddy (which is hard to find when you're 15), but she was paying him AND bringing him coffee.....

Offline

 

#175 2009-08-23 12:00:08

Emmeran wrote:

This is a new level of idiocy - not only did he throw away a perfectly good fuck buddy (which is hard to find when you're 15), but she was paying him AND bringing him coffee.....

I don't think the complaint originated with the kid.  Reading between the lines, it looks like the shit hit the fan when the mama found out what was going on.

And I am still of the opinion that grown-up ladies should not fuck underage boys.

I went back and found this to resurrect.  It's a comment by a teacher I found some time back on another forum:

Nothing raises my hackles more than teachers who enter the profession in an attempt to relive their glory days (or who hope that they can FINALLY be “popular”). These teachers thrive on the students’ drama and gossip. They would rather be liked than respected. They compromise their integrity in an effort to be “cool” in the eyes of their students. Whenever you see a teacher on the news who has had an affair with a student, you can rest assured that it’s one of these teachers.

Apply this profile to women in their 30s, and you have your boyfucking lady teachers in a nutshell...Not such a turn-on any more, is it?

Offline

 

#176 2009-08-23 12:37:41

George Orr wrote:

Not such a turn-on any more, is it?

I'm gonna go ahead and assume you weren't asking me this.

Offline

 

#177 2009-08-24 08:50:57

How is it any different, fucking 35 year old teachers in their desperate attempt to be popular vs fucking 18 year old cheerleaders in their desperate attempt to be popular?

Shit, that's hot! Off to pornfuze for a head-to-head challenge!

Offline

 

#178 2009-08-24 10:25:58

George Orr wrote:

Emmeran wrote:

This is a new level of idiocy - not only did he throw away a perfectly good fuck buddy (which is hard to find when you're 15), but she was paying him AND bringing him coffee.....

I don't think the complaint originated with the kid.  Reading between the lines, it looks like the shit hit the fan when the mama found out what was going on.

And I am still of the opinion that grown-up ladies should not fuck underage boys.

I went back and found this to resurrect.  It's a comment by a teacher I found some time back on another forum:

Nothing raises my hackles more than teachers who enter the profession in an attempt to relive their glory days (or who hope that they can FINALLY be “popular”). These teachers thrive on the students’ drama and gossip. They would rather be liked than respected. They compromise their integrity in an effort to be “cool” in the eyes of their students. Whenever you see a teacher on the news who has had an affair with a student, you can rest assured that it’s one of these teachers.

Apply this profile to women in their 30s, and you have your boyfucking lady teachers in a nutshell...Not such a turn-on any more, is it?

You're kidding right?  Cuz if you aren't kidding then you just don't have any clue about boys...

Let me put it this way, we really don't care why the woman is letting us fuck them - at 15 that is magnified by 100.

Offline

 

#179 2009-08-24 12:00:48

George Orr wrote:

And I am still of the opinion that grown-up ladies should not fuck underage boys.

What the hell did underage boys do to you to make you so mean?

Offline

 

#180 2009-08-24 14:06:54

George Orr wrote:

And I am still of the opinion that grown-up ladies should not fuck underage boys.

How else are they supposed to learn?  Jeez, did you people *never* see the "The Summer of 42"?

Cripes, women complain that guys never know how to please them.  And yet here we have fine, well meaning, public-spirited young men, seeing out the very people that can best educate them in the proper pleasuring of a woman... and they get grief. 

*sigh*

TOBAL.

Offline

 

#181 2009-08-24 16:08:23

whosasailorthen wrote:

George Orr wrote:

And I am still of the opinion that grown-up ladies should not fuck underage boys.

How else are they supposed to learn?  Jeez, did you people *never* see the "The Summer of 42"?

Only about a dozen times. I watched its filming.

Offline

 

#182 2009-08-24 20:47:37

Snowball wrote:

And I am still of the opinion that grown-up ladies should not fuck underage boys.

The music teacher at my high-school not only fucked the bass player from my band (He was six-teen at the time which was over the age of consent in Virginia; Still, she was his teacher); But, they got married when he turned eight-teen.

Offline

 

#183 2009-08-24 21:06:08

Decadence wrote:

Snowball wrote:

And I am still of the opinion that grown-up ladies should not fuck underage boys.

The music teacher at my high-school not only fucked the bass player from my band (He was six-teen at the time which was over the age of consent in Virginia; Still, she was his teacher); But, they got married when he turned eight-teen.

Dec, that's the exception, rather than the rule, and you know it. I agree with Georgie. If a grown-up female type laid her hands on either of my boys, I would rip her tits off and cram them down her throat.

Offline

 

#184 2009-08-24 22:05:53

karenw wrote:

Decadence wrote:

Snowball wrote:

And I am still of the opinion that grown-up ladies should not fuck underage boys.

The music teacher at my high-school not only fucked the bass player from my band (He was six-teen at the time which was over the age of consent in Virginia; Still, she was his teacher); But, they got married when he turned eight-teen.

Dec, that's the exception, rather than the rule, and you know it. I agree with Georgie. If a grown-up female type laid her hands on either of my boys, I would rip her tits off and cram them down her throat.

I hate to break up the boys vs. girls nature of the debate thus far, but I'd tend to agree with karenw here.  I wouldn't want one of my son's formative experiences to be with some lady with weird post-high-school issues or who just likes younger boys so much that she'll risk her career and/or jail-time just to get into a sexual situation with them.

Offline

 

#185 2009-08-24 22:15:02

tojo2000 wrote:

I wouldn't want one of my son's formative experiences to be with some lady with weird post-high-school issues or who just likes younger boys so much that she'll risk her career and/or jail-time just to get into a sexual situation with them.

You just said what I was trying to say, but better.

Offline

 

#186 2009-08-24 23:43:06

All I am seeing on one side of this conversation is enforcement of a christian-judaic meme.  In many societies through out history, the education of the young was entrusted to older members of the opposite sex: Fact. 

Yet, teachers operating out of their neurosis are probably not the optimal models to choose for initiations of this sort.  Especially with the way this society views any form of sexual expression.  Waaaaaaay to much crapola.

Offline

 

#187 2009-08-25 03:01:28

Dmtdust wrote:

All I am seeing on one side of this conversation is enforcement of a christian-judaic meme.

Dusty, feel free to choke on my stubby pink foul-smelling cock and balls, you shallow-minded prick.  With few exceptions people have given reasoned explanations for their positions, and I don't think you'd know a Judeo-Christian meme if it sent you to purgatory and made you hang out with a bunch of aborted babies for half of eternity.

Offline

 

#188 2009-08-25 10:48:26

I stand by my statement, I was that kid and had my parents become involved I would have been pissed off forever.  Up to that point in my life it had all been teen girls teasing like there was no tomorrow; I was quite pleased to go from "stinky finger" to "wet dick".

And let me be very clear:

She wasn't taking advantage of me, she allowed me take advantage of her.

Offline

 

#189 2009-08-25 17:07:07

Emmeran wrote:

I stand by my statement, I was that kid and had my parents become involved I would have been pissed off forever.  Up to that point in my life it had all been teen girls teasing like there was no tomorrow; I was quite pleased to go from "stinky finger" to "wet dick".

And let me be very clear:

She wasn't taking advantage of me, she allowed me take advantage of her.

A-fucking-men.

Offline

 

#190 2009-08-25 20:02:26

Bigcat wrote:

Emmeran wrote:

She wasn't taking advantage of me, she allowed me take advantage of her.

A-fucking-men.

Fucking-A, y'all, I sing the same song. I was your standard issue gawky, maladjusted and pissed off teenmonster and I'll go to my grave regretting I did the right thing when my friend's mothers hit on me. The 60s, remember? Lay, lady, lay...

Offline

 

#191 2009-08-26 01:32:31

Emmeran wrote:

I stand by my statement, I was that kid and had my parents become involved I would have been pissed off forever.  Up to that point in my life it had all been teen girls teasing like there was no tomorrow; I was quite pleased to go from "stinky finger" to "wet dick".

And let me be very clear:

She wasn't taking advantage of me, she allowed me take advantage of her.

Sorry, but you made me laugh out loud with this one.  Are you really so stupid that you think that your 13-year-old wiles were so much that you took advantage of an older lady?

Offline

 

#192 2009-08-26 01:46:32

Oh Tojo.....

Offline

 

#193 2009-08-26 01:50:51

Dmtdust wrote:

Oh Tojo.....

Oh, that makes me feel so terrible...  How could I insinuate that a 13-year-old might not know whether or not he was seducing an older lady?  How could I forget how stupid ladies are?

Edit:  May I suggest that anyone who doesn't understand why I scoff actually go talk to a 13-year-old for a bit?  You'll find they're quite transparent and immature, especially when they think they're being suave.

Last edited by tojo2000 (2009-08-26 01:52:03)

Offline

 

#194 2009-08-26 10:38:34

tojo2000 wrote:

Dmtdust wrote:

Oh Tojo.....

Oh, that makes me feel so terrible...  How could I insinuate that a 13-year-old might not know whether or not he was seducing an older lady?  How could I forget how stupid ladies are?

Edit:  May I suggest that anyone who doesn't understand why I scoff actually go talk to a 13-year-old for a bit?  You'll find they're quite transparent and immature, especially when they think they're being suave.

You felt bad because the sad monkey pounded his pud?  Weally?

Offline

 

#195 2009-08-26 10:50:20

tojo2000 wrote:

Oh, that makes me feel so terrible...  How could I insinuate that a 13-year-old might not know whether or not he was seducing an older lady?  How could I forget how stupid ladies are?

Edit:  May I suggest that anyone who doesn't understand why I scoff actually go talk to a 13-year-old for a bit?  You'll find they're quite transparent and immature, especially when they think they're being suave.

Did you completely misunderstand the usage of the word "allowed"???

Emmeran wrote:

She wasn't taking advantage of me, she allowed me take advantage of her.

Webster wrote:

al⋅low  –verb (used with object) 1. to give permission to or for; permit:

Don't be so pettily envious, you'll not convince us that as a red-blooded heterosexual boy you wouldn't have jumped at the opportunity...

...although I'm beginning to seriously doubt your heterosexuality.


PS:  I have a 13 year old son, I know better than to wear rose-colored glasses.

Offline

 

Board footer

high-street.org